Is a Doctor's Negligence Ever Automatic In a Medical Malpractice Case?

The liability concept "res ipsa loquitur" can help tip the balance of a medical malpractice lawsuit more in the patient's favor.

Updated by , J.D.

Even when you're confident that you have a valid medical malpractice case, it's rarely simple to prove that a health care provider actually committed medical negligence. A complex intersection of medical and legal issues is often at the center of these claims. A health care provider's negligence is never "automatic," but in some situations a legal concept known as "res ipsa loquitur" —a Latin phrase meaning "the thing speaks for itself"—may make it easier for some patients.

In this article, we'll discuss how "res ipsa loquitur" works within the framework of a medical malpractice case.

Proving Fault In Medical Malpractice Cases

Establishing wrongdoing on the part of a health care provider usually requires the hiring of expert medical witnesses (usually in the same field as the health care professional being charged with misconduct) who must testify as to what the defendant should have done under the applicable medical standard of care.

Winning a medical malpractice case is a challenge because the defendants (the health care professionals being sued) are often the ones who made the findings and wrote the summaries and observations that make up the bulk of the patient's medical records. And since these defendants are often the only ones who were present when the alleged medical negligence happened, even the most well-trained and knowledgeable expert medical witnesses will have their hands full in examining all the evidence, figuring out what really happened in terms of the provision of care to the patient, and then persuading the jury as to what should have happened under the circumstances.

What Is "Res Ipsa Loquitur"?

Fortunately, the law recognizes the challenges of proving medical malpractice, and the concept of "res ipsa loquitur" can help tip the balance more in the patient's favor when something seems to have gone wrong in the health care setting.

Here's how it works:

  • If a patient is injured as the result of a medical procedure, and
  • the patient does not know exactly what caused his or her injury,
  • but it is the type of injury that would not have occurred without negligence on the part of the health care provider(s)

...then the patient might be able to invoke a legal doctrine known as "res ipsa loquitur." As the Latin translation ("the thing speaks for itself") implies, the plaintiff would then only need to show that a particular result occurred, and that it would not have occurred unless someone was negligent.

To invoke this doctrine successfully, a plaintiff usually has to show that:

  • evidence of the actual cause of the injury is not obtainable
  • the injury is not the kind that ordinarily occurs in the absence of negligence by someone
  • the plaintiff was not responsible for his or her own injury
  • the defendant, or its employees or agents (i.e. hospital employees or staff), had exclusive control of the instrumentality that caused the injury, and
  • the injury could not have been caused by any instrumentality other than that over which the defendant had control (note: we'll cut through some of this legalese in the next section).

The Legal Effect of Invoking Res Ipsa Loquitur

Once this doctrine is successfully invoked in any kind of medical malpractice case, the burden is not on the patient to show how the defendant was negligent, but on the defendant to show that he or she was not negligent.

A classic example of the type of case in which "res ipsa loquitur" arises is where a sponge or other medical instrument is left inside a person after surgery. Typically, records of the surgery will not include a statement such as "Dr. Smith left forceps in patient's abdomen," and there may be no recorded proof of how or why the negligence occurred. Yet clearly, a surgical instrument would not be left in a patient in the absence of someone's negligence. Also, an unconscious patient certainly cannot be deemed responsible for this type of injury, and it would have been the operating physician and staff who had exclusive control over the surgical tools. So, "res ipsa loquitur" would likely apply here.

Who Gets the [change this] Blame?

So, continuing on with the example from the last section, the burden falls not on the patient to prove who left the surgical instrument inside him or her, but on the individual health care providers to try to establish that it was not their negligence that resulted in the injury.

If an attending physician, who is an independent contractor rather than an employee of a hospital, can demonstrate that he left the operating room and instructed a nurse, who was a hospital employee, to remove and account for all surgical instruments before the surgical area was closed, the hospital might be held liable for the negligence of its employee.

In any event, the co-defendants (rather than the plaintiff) do the bulk of the investigation and the finger-pointing once res ipsa loquitur is successfully invoked.

To learn more about the potential strengths and weaknesses of your own medical malpractice case, it might make sense to discuss your situation with a medical malpractice lawyer. You can use the tools right on this page to connect with a lawyer, or learn more about finding the right medical malpractice lawyer for you and your case.

Make the Most of Your Claim

Get the compensation you deserve.

We've helped 175 clients find attorneys today.

How It Works

  1. Briefly tell us about your case
  2. Provide your contact information
  3. Choose attorneys to contact you

Talk to a Lawyer

Start here to find personal injury lawyers near you.

How it Works

  1. Briefly tell us about your case
  2. Provide your contact information
  3. Choose attorneys to contact you