Property Owner vs. Occupier Liability for Personal Injury

Most commonly, the occupier (tenant or occupying owner) of property will be held responsible for injuries occurring on the property.

Either an owner or an occupier of property can be held responsible in a premises liability case. Who will be held liable boils down to who was in control -- or should have been in control -- of the part of the property where the injury occurred. Read on to learn more

Liability of the Person Occupying the Property

An occupier of property will generally be held responsible for injuries occurring on the property, regardless of who the actual owner is. The typical occupier, as opposed to an owner, will be a residential or commercial tenant.

However, even someone who is occupying property without the owner’s permission or knowledge will be held responsible for premises liability if a judge or jury determines they were in control of the land at the time of the accident. A widely used test goes like this:

1) Whoever is occupying the property with an intent to control it is liable.2) Whoever is the last person to occupy abandoned property with an intent to control it is liable.3) Whoever is legally entitled to occupy the property is liable when the first two tests above don't apply.

Therefore, a tenant or other occupier is not only potentially liable for injuries occurring on that part of the property they are legally renting out, but on any part of the property that they intentionally take control of.

Owner Liability for Injuries on the Property

If a property is not rented out or otherwise occupied, the owner is the potentially liable party under the laws of premises liability. However, even with a tenant or other occupier on the property, an owner can still be liable in several situations.

First, an owner is liable for injuries occurring on any part of the property over which the owner has retained control. For example, common areas used by multiple tenants are legally considered under the control of the owner. To illustrate, if a tenant or other person invited onto the property is injured in a common area like a hallway or staircase, the owner (not the tenant) will be held liable.

An owner can also be held liable if he or she rents out the property in a dangerous condition without warning the tenant. In that case, even if the tenant is in total control of the property, any injuries stemming from the previously existing dangerous condition will be the owner’s responsibility. Note that if the owner tells the tenant about the dangerous condition and notifies the tenant that he or she must repair the condition as part of the lease, responsibility shifts back to the tenant.

Finally, if a lease or ordinance doesn’t make an owner responsible for dangerous conditions that occur while the tenant is in control of the property, the tenant will be held responsible for any injuries caused by the condition. However, if a lease, ordinance or other regulation requires the owner to repair certain conditions, or if the owner otherwise promises to fix a condition, but the condition causes an injury anyway, the owner will be liable for any injuries despite the tenant’s control of the property.

Examples of Owner vs. Occupier Liabilty

Example A: A tenant invites a guest to her apartment. A puddle has formed inside the tenant’s apartment next to the tenant’s umbrella stand. The guest slips on the puddle and is injured. Because the injury occurred in the tenant’s apartment and the puddle was caused by the tenant’s own umbrella stand, the tenant will be liable to the guest.

Example B: A tenant invites a guest to her apartment. At the main entrance to the apartment building, the guest slips on a puddle that has formed next to an umbrella stand provided by the owner-landlord. The landlord will be held liable for the guest’s injuries.

Example C: A grocery business owner runs his store in a leased building. A customer slips on a puddle of milk and is injured. The business owner is liable to the customer.

Example D: A building owner leases her building to a grocery business. The building owner knows that the automatic doors at the entrance have malfunctioned in the past, but does not tell the grocery proprietor and the grocery proprietor is unable to discover the potential for malfunction himself. A customer is injured when the doors malfunction and suddenly close on his foot. The building owner is liable to the customer.

Learn More

See Alllaw's section on Premises Liability Laws for more articles covering injuries on private property.

Talk to a Lawyer

Need a lawyer? Start here.

How It Works

  1. Briefly tell us about your case
  2. Provide your contact information
  3. Choose attorneys to contact you
NOLODRUPAL-web3:DRU1.6.12.2.20161011.41205